Downsizing Kinostart

Downsizing Kinostart Das könnte dich auch interessieren
Ein Ehepaar will sich auf zwölf Zentimeter schrumpfen lassen, denn von kleineren Menschen werden natürlich weniger Ressourcen verbraucht, was allen ein Luxusleben ermöglicht. Doch als Paul als Winzling erwacht, muss er feststellen, dass seine Frau. Der Film eröffnete am August die Internationalen Filmfestspiele von Venedig. Der Kinostart in den USA war am Dezember In Deutschland. Man bekam im Trailer auch nicht wirklich mit was der Film jetzt für eine Story hat abgesehen vom Schrumpfen. Die erste Hälfte war vielversprechend und. Downsizing. Ein Starensemble mit Matt Damon, Christoph Waltz und anderen macht die Science Fiction-Satire zu einem Kinovergnügen, das jede Menge. Die Idee eines Wissenschaftlers, die vom Menschen verursachten Probleme auf der Erde durch Schrumpfung zu lösen, hat in einer nahen Zukunft großen. In der Gesellschaftssatire Downsizing von Alexander Payne schrumpft sich Matt Damon, um weniger der schrumpfenden Ressourcen der Erde zu verbrauchen. "Downsizing": Das Rezept gegen das Aussterben der Menschheit. #Interview in your browser. Trailer zu "Downsizing" (Kinostart: ).

Downsizing USA , Laufzeit: Min., FSK 0. Regie: Alexander Payne Darsteller: Matt Damon, Kristen Wiig, Christoph Waltz, Hong Chau, Jason Sudeikis. Downsizing. FSK0 USA min 51 sek. Paramount Pictures Germany GmbH, Unterföhring. TRAILER. Downsizing. Trailer ab 0 Jahren. FSK0. Das könnte dich auch interessieren. Möchte ich sehen. Jim Burke. Downsizing: Dsds Live Shows 2019 Tickets mit Matt Damon als einfachen Hausmann, der sich schrumpfen lässt, um ein Venom Kinox.To Leben zu führen - doch ist die Mikrowelt wirklich so wundervoll? Ich habe glaube ich noch nie eine derart völlig unsympathische und nervige Weibliche No, I cannot help you here. You are on your own. Because, woah! There are poor people in Little World!?!? So he gets his friend Dusan, to make a cover story that they are going to go to Europe for some odd reason or other.
But wait! So they are now going with her, and who is she going to meet? But the inventor of the downsizing process. I kid you not.
And so off they go on a European Vacation for little people to a little valley out in the real world where only little people live. And better yet?
Did I even get that right? That makes no sense to me when I type it out. As far as scripts go, I have never seen anything like this script.
It is rambling and lacking in point. But maybe I just missed some key tell? The summary on IMDB calls it a social satire… but on what? A satire on our materialism?
A satire on technology and our cluelessness as to its impacts? But, not really? If anything it was a character study of someone buffeted by the whims and speculations of society desperate for meaning and desperate for clarity.
Everything is perfect. Let me put it this way, the creators of Downsizing assume that modern technology can create everything at normal sizes perfectly at smaller sizes.
Cars are plastic replicas, biggified. The sets are all just gorgeous neighborhoods. And that is the extent of it.
Sure, we jump forward 15 to 20 years in time. But seriously? This discussion about the movie has so far been all over the map.
Special effects. Script discussions. Zeitgeist chaos and questions. So, with that in mind… I have assembled a few of the best theories to explain this car crash of a script.
The most obvious, elementary school reading of this movie is that Alexander Payne took the small house idea and flipped it on its head.
Instead of just decreasing our global footprint square footage by buying less, farming more, etc. There is one scene where a half drunk guy in a bar spews venom at smallified individuals for depressing the housing market, the job market, and the economy over all.
Which then causes markets to drag and even crash as a result. Downsizing, the movie, also points out that no matter how small people become, you will always have the poorer, and the less fortunate among you.
It will always be an issue. What if Mr. Payne was writing a counter revolutionary pamphlet? A call to revolution, a call to a massive change to the order of things in order to solve societal problems that Alexander Payne sees in the world.
Not just pollution and ocean levels, but the inbound end of the world. And Mr. Payne has written here a treatise on how to avoid the obvious end of the world he sees clearly coming.
To say that this movie is serious on any front defies all sanity. But I wish Payne had gone the Payne route.
I wish he had gone all in on this movie and given us something meaty to think about. But Paul Safranek is such a unworthy vessel to carry this message.
He has a hard enough finding someone to take him or his troubles seriously. Let alone teach the audience how to live our lives in such a way as to avoid global catastrophe.
Suburbicon was fantastic as cutting social and racial observation of America at large. It took an amazing moment in history the Levittown suburb housing complex incidents , folded in a fictional murder, and voila, Clooney had the workings of an amazing New York Times Op-Ed piece for thinking men and women everywhere.
Could it be that Alexander Payne was reaching for the stars of Op-Ed fame-dom and just wiped out along the way? Could the goal have been a societal commentary shedding light on our eco-unfriendliness and our societal chaos towards being anything other than me-focused?
To blend elements of Theory 1 and 2 simultaneously? Long and short of it? This theory gives way too much credit to Payne and minimizes the achievements of Suburbicon.
Which, I doubt many enjoyed, but most could have learned from. Did you know that was based on reality? But Downsizing? What reality are we going after here?
What windmill exactly is Payne tilting at? It is nothing and everything. There is no distinguishable idea here that can be spotted and identified here.
It is a wandering miasmic chaos from beginning to end. One of the problems with Downsizing, as I mentioned in the previous theory, is Paul Safranek.
He is a horrible, witless person. He and his wife decide they cannot afford the plush life they deserve and so they head to the downsizing world.
But Mrs. Safranek ditches Paul at the altar of the operating table. Then he begins his life of social obligation and frantic assistance of Ngoc who forces him to help out of social debt.
Could it be that Paul is being mentored by Mister Miyagi? Wax ON! Wax OFF! Is Ngoc teaching him how to live the good life through repetition and senseless actions?
Is the audience being taught muscle memory on how to make the world a better place? Could it be? The entire 2nd half of the movie follows Paul and Ngoc as they run around the Barrio of Smallville helping an endless array of people in need.
It all starts with an assisted suicide. And marches off into Paul becoming a full blow physician as no one else will make the effort to help the people who are so badly in need of it.
This is something I can get behind. True religion after all is the widow, the orphan and the impoverished. But to blow a hole in this theory wider than Texas, I have to wonder why if it really is about the needs of others first and the impoverished in every community, why did Downsizing abruptly leave this community?
If it was really about finding those in need around you, why did they leave them when Paul was only just starting to learn this lesson?!?
This is not the point of this particular movie… or if it is, they were horribly fickle with this particular point. In effect, Paul is going to meet God.
Or, at least, a god like figure. The demi-god of Downsizing anyway. But when they finally meet him we learn that he believes that the world is about to end.
Something about massive amounts of methane and gas being released? So much so that the littles oh come on, that was funny have created an underground ark to ride out the storm.
And Paul?!? Oh my gosh! He has to go! I mean, God is calling him. He literally says this. I am not, I cannot, make this stuff up. So he tries to convince that Ngoc should come.
Oh well. Gotta go. They decide to go for it, applying for a spot at Leisureland, a "downsized" community in New Mexico, hyped up to hopeful applicants with a promotional video starring married couple Jeff and Laura Lonowski Neil Patrick Harris and Laura Dern , both wearing ear-mikes, doing marital "banter" in their echoing McMansion the size of a dollhouse about how awesome life is once you go small.
The "downsizing" process is shown in intriguing detail, and make up the best sequences in the film. They're imaginative and funny and detailed. People's gold teeth must be removed, otherwise their heads would explode during downsizing.
All body hair is removed, too. These details support a logical universe it would have been funny to see some of the disastrous early attempts to "go small," a tiny man trailing a beard 20 miles long, etc.
When Paul wakes up in the recovery rooms of Leisureland, he learns that Audrey backed out at the last minute.
Unfortunately that also means Wiig has exited the movie. Paul now must make it through Smallville on his own. His party-hound Eurotrash upstairs neighbor Dusan Mirkovic Christoph Waltz , doing his typical schtick tries to get him to have some fun with being small.
Paul instead is drawn to Ngoc Lan Tran Hong Chau , Dusan's Vietnamese cleaning lady whose escape to America in a television box caused an international incident.
Through Ngoc Lan, Paul learns of the darker side of Leisureland, its rigid and racist class system, the built-in haves and have nots of our world make up Leisureland too.
Ngoc Lan lives in a rundown tenement complex outside the "Truman Show" walls of Leisureland. She takes care of everyone, bringing food to the hungry, medicine to the sick.
She enlists Paul's help in this. She will not take No for an answer. Paul is drawn along, against his will, into a world where helping other people—because it's the right thing to do—is the norm.
There are a lot of problems with all of this. Because Ngoc Lan is such a strong character, and Chau is so funny and strident and bossy, she takes over the entire film.
Matt Damon doesn't stand a chance. This may be the whole point, but it makes for really unbalanced viewing. Every "Everyman" needs to have some "oomph" of his own if he is going to occupy the center of a film.
He is our "way in. George Bailey in " It's a Wonderful Life " is the ultimate "Everyman," and his journey from depressive resentful sacrifice to the redemption of human belonging is still searingly powerful today, because he seems like a real man, we can identify strongly with his experiences.
Det er lidt som om den ikke kan finde sin stemning. Jeg synes ikke det er vellykket. Den var dog mindre fjollet og mere alvorlig end man kunne forvente, og ideen er jo interessant nok kan man sige.
Den var bestemt anderledes end forventet. Dertil er karaktererne alt for underspillede. Log ind. Drama , Komedie , Science Fiction.
Versioner: se alle 2D, Babybio. Downsizing Matt Damon bliver skrumpet. Brugerne 3. Mediernes vurdering 5 4.
Relaterede nyheder. Ekstra Bladet. Filmland P1.
Ich entschuldige mich, aber diese Variante kommt mir nicht heran. Wer noch, was vorsagen kann?